In response to something
mactavish posted, I wrote
Nothing odd in that--except that I started to write "
cattitude or Q" and realized that at this point, the same consideration would apply to
adrian_turtle. This is part of why I don't label my relationships as primary or secondary: they are what they are, and they change.
I am a very fortunate Vicki.
I don't have veto power with any of my partners--but if any of them said "I don't think that's a good idea" I'd ask why, and take it seriously. And I'd give them similar information, if I had it about someone that one of my partners were interested in: that's part of caring for each other.
Nothing odd in that--except that I started to write "
I am a very fortunate Vicki.
Tags:
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
In another sense, while you three aren't the only people whose opinions or wishes I'd take into account in this regard, the degree of entanglement is such that I'd pay more attention to you three than to other people.
Mostly, I noticed that I was looking at it this way, which I wouldn't have six or even three months ago, and thought that worth noting.
From:
no subject
What I find wonderful about your relationship dynamics is that people feel comfortable saying "I don't think that's a good idea". Many years ago I was in a relationship where I wasn't allowed to say things like that. I have since come to the conclusion that this is where all that Passive-Agressive behavior came from. I'm much better now.
Janice
From:
no subject
I'm not sure if this is indicative more of how seldom I'm interested in someone who is also interested in me, or of my partners and I having similar enough views that the only likely "I think that would be a bad idea" would be someone I had just met who one of them already knew and had reason to be wary of.
From:
no subject