In response to something [livejournal.com profile] mactavish posted, I wrote

I don't have veto power with any of my partners--but if any of them said "I don't think that's a good idea" I'd ask why, and take it seriously. And I'd give them similar information, if I had it about someone that one of my partners were interested in: that's part of caring for each other.


Nothing odd in that--except that I started to write "[livejournal.com profile] cattitude or Q" and realized that at this point, the same consideration would apply to [livejournal.com profile] adrian_turtle. This is part of why I don't label my relationships as primary or secondary: they are what they are, and they change.

I am a very fortunate Vicki.

From: [identity profile] adrian-turtle.livejournal.com


That's certainly a valuable kind of consideration. I don't mean to discount it by saying it can be orthogonal to questions of whether someone is a primary, or whether someone is a sweetie at all. When someone says "I don't think that's a good idea" and I take it seriously, that recognizes I think the person knows me well and has good judgement. It doesn't have anything to do with whether my relationship with the person is a priority.


From: [identity profile] shikzoid.livejournal.com


When I read this I can hear the wonder and delight in your voice. It warms the cockles of my heart.

What I find wonderful about your relationship dynamics is that people feel comfortable saying "I don't think that's a good idea". Many years ago I was in a relationship where I wasn't allowed to say things like that. I have since come to the conclusion that this is where all that Passive-Agressive behavior came from. I'm much better now.

Janice
lcohen: (smile)

From: [personal profile] lcohen


*smiles and smiles for you*
.

About Me

redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
Redbird

Most-used tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style credit

Expand cut tags

No cut tags