![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I had a long day, full of meetings and people talking too much. The last was a focus group that went on too long because of one person talking too much and not following the very specifically stated brief: I said we're here to give recommendations to decision-makers and service providers, and this guy did what he always does which is "here's how I get around that by being Resilient and taking individual responsibility for this systemic problem! Cool story, bro.
After a day like that, with an ending like that, it was very sweet to get a message from my favorite person on my favorite team (mine). Our manager has asked her to work with me on the latest report, so this morning I asked if we could arrange a meeting and it'll be tomorrow morning. So at the very end of the day today, she sends me this:
Hi, this is just a message to tell you that I have reread [the last report, 2 of 3]. I now have an overwhelming urge to tell you that you are such a smart cookie. The report is brilliant and incredibly comprehensive. I'm quite intimidated in supporting you with [report 3 of 3]. Anyway this is me belatedly telling you that you are an awesome [our job title] and maybe you could eat a celebratory chocolate biscuit and pat yourself on the back.
A few sentences like that go a long way!
You know the way I just said -- I just said -- that I had worked out how to make wagamama's current menu yield something I was actively enthusiastic about eating?
WELL GUESS WHAT. THIRD TIME UNLUCKY.
I had really not expected the pad thai to vanish in a menu overhaul, okay, what on EARTH.
(So we came home and ate butternut squash & quince stew instead, and maybe by the next time it is Ritual Wagamama O'Clock I'll have resigned myself to eating something that isn't The Thing I Just Worked Out.)
If the U.S. were only 100 people, this is what they’d believe: 63 are Christian, 30 are religiously unaffiliated, and 7 have a non-Christian faith.
This graph maps those differences out into more specific categories, bringing blink-of-an-eye clarity to a complex topic. But it does not show changes over time. And those changes add critical context.
The graph is based on the third of Pew Research Center’s Religious Landscape Studies. Taken together, they reveal a dramatic drop in the number of Americans self-identifying as Christian: from 78% in 2007, 71% in 2014, and down to 63% in its latest survey (2023-24).
That last figure, however, seems to be holding steady since 2019. In other words, the decline of Christianity in America appears to have stabilized. Here’s a closer look at the losses since 2007:
Altogether, in just a decade and a half, Christian denominations lost about 15% of the total population. Where did those formerly faithful go? Mostly not to other faiths, the numbers show, but rather to various categories of religious unaffiliation.
Add up the Christians and the unaffiliated (mainly former Christians), and you’ve still got more than nine out of ten Americans. That is to say: the share of non-Christian religions, although growing fast, remains small overall. In 2007, 4.7% of U.S. adults identified with a religion other than Christianity. In 2023-24, that has gone up to 7.1%.
When Pew publishes its next Religious Landscape Study, around 2030-31, what will this graph look like?
Anecdotal reports in the media seem to indicate a resurgence of interest in religion among younger generations, notably in the Catholic church — perhaps helped by the recent inauguration of its first American-born Pope. But it should be noted that people abandoning religion usually do so less vocally than those joining up. And, as the Pew study shows, the latter clearly outnumber the former, at least in recent years.
Perhaps that will change. God, or the Universe, works in mysterious ways.
For (a lot) more great graphs on religion in America, check out Ryan Burge’s feed on X.
Strange Maps #1280
Got a strange map? Let me know at strangemaps@gmail.com.
Follow Strange Maps on X and Facebook.
This article Mapped: If America were 100 people, this is what they’d believe is featured on Big Think.
The new hate crime figures are out, apparently disability hate crime is slightly down. Am I being cynical in assuming that's probably because some of the haters are too busy committing hate crimes against muslims and/or jews and/or anyone who doesn't look like them?
Trans hate crime is also slightly down, but I'd presume that would be people feeling even less safe to report it, rather than an actual reduction.
The figures exclude the Met, the biggest force in the country because they're busy adopting a new crime reporting tool - so give us their figures as a separate entry, don't just exclude them entirely. *headdesk*
Somewhat embarrassingly for the police/Home Office, the Office for Statistics Regulation is still insisting they include a caveat to say their data is actually pretty crap.
I see estimates differ: I was working from the Sturgeon's Law that '90% of anything is crap' -
- whereas Ridley Scott is prepared to claim that '60% of films made today are “shit”, and of the remaining 40%, “25% … is not bad, and 10% is pretty good, and the top 5% is great”. and that this is pretty much so for the history of the movies over time (a fairly nuanced judgement I suppose) (though we should probably factor in the extent to which film, especially from the nitrate era, was a very frangible medium and there is a survival issue....)
From the Wikipedia article on Sturgeon's Law, some confirming opinions by other thinkerz:
'Nine-tenths of existing books are nonsense, and the clever books are the refutation of that nonsense' (Disraeli, 1870)
'Four-fifths of everybody's work must be bad. But the remnant is worth the trouble for its own sake. (Kipling, 1890)
'In much more than nine cases out of ten the only objectively truthful criticism would be "This book is worthless...'(Wot a grump George Orwell was, eh, 1946)
A 2009 paper in The Lancet estimated that over 85% of health and medical research is wasted.
(The trouble is you cannot tell in advance what is going to be, can you.)
On reflection I rather like Scott's 'not bad - pretty good - great' because one can, in fact, get enjoyment out of those levels.