I realized a while ago that I wasn't sure of the correct pronouns for some of the people I know here, and I'd like to. So, please comment and tell me what pronouns to use for you. (Note that I'm not screening these comments, in case that's relevant: I know at least one person who uses different pronouns online and in person.)
I'm trying to default to "they" when I don't know people's pronouns, but I may not always realize I don't know.
My pronouns are she/her, and I'm fine with they/them, zie/zir, or Spivak pronouns if you use them for everyone. (ETA, since someone asked: Spivak pronouns are e/em/eir or ey/em/eir: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spivak_pronoun. (I ran across these on a LambdaMOO clone, which is also where I first used
redbird as a username.)
I'm trying to default to "they" when I don't know people's pronouns, but I may not always realize I don't know.
My pronouns are she/her, and I'm fine with they/them, zie/zir, or Spivak pronouns if you use them for everyone. (ETA, since someone asked: Spivak pronouns are e/em/eir or ey/em/eir: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spivak_pronoun. (I ran across these on a LambdaMOO clone, which is also where I first used
Tags:
From:
no subject
(angerface is not at you; I do not recall as I have ever noticed you misgendering me)
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
unscreening is fine
I'm Ms. Non-Traditional Female, basically. ("I am a woman, therefore what I do is female.")
From:
no subject
(but try getting anyone at Major NonProfit to do anything beyond "he etc" "she etc" or "they etc"... which has left me with "they etc" which sucks. I am way too much the grammarian to ever get comfortable with it! Have trained my friends -- in person -- to "What is Cubby wearing? If it gives off "more traditionally girl vibe then it's she etc" and "If it gives off more traditionally male vibe it's he etc" but, I realized such things are not always possible online - thus Spivak. Which I actually used when I was on a MUSH.)
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(Nota bene: The implicit snark in the following is NOT REPEAT NOT aimed at you.)
«"they etc" which sucks. I am way too much the grammarian to ever get comfortable with it!»
I also am a grammarian, and a certified linguist (UCB PhD).
Ic wolde asken so of thee, whether thou beest likewise discomforted by þe novell usage of "ȝe", oft writ as "ye" or e'en "you", in address to ane sole person, as is properly don with "þú", latterly "thou", holdyng "ye/you" in propre resarve for speche to twain or more.
Respectfully submitted,
Dr. Whom: Consulting Linguist, Grammarian, Orthoëpist, and Philological Busybody
(depicted above as "Dr. Whomster")
© Charlene Taylor D'Alessio http://home.earthlink.net/~edisonbear/ Used by permission
Description: Tom Baker's Dr. Who, as an anthropomorphic hamster, in front of the Tardis. ©C.T.D'Alessio http://tinyurl.com/9q2gkko
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Yes, it would be nice to have a specifically singular non-gendered pronoun, just as it would sometimes be useful to still have "thou" as the singular of "you," but that's not how the language is evolving. In both cases, people can clarify, or ask for clarification: "Is my partner also invited, or just me?" or "Let's get together and catch up, just the two of us." (Few of the people who complain about this seem to notice that English could use, not only a more generally accepted/prestigious "y'all" or "youse," but forms of "we" that distinguish "this group of people, including the one(s) I'm talking to" from "a group that includes me but not you."
From:
no subject
To signal gender, it would be so convenient to have different pronouns for "I" / "me" (like in Japanese, though I think all the gendered "I" pronouns are informal). But designed languages haven't done so great so far, so I guess we'll just have to live with the organically evolving ones, with their issues and their charm.
From:
no subject
This is work I need to be doing too.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Unofficially, I answer any pronouns that don't refer to objects, just to keep it "simple" as I usually shop the mens rack. :)
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(I actually have evidence of the not being offended by they thing! A few months ago I held it as a philosophical position, and then it happened and lo, I was not offended. It's really nice when our philosophical beliefs and our actual reactions line up the way we hope they do.)
From:
no subject
I like this idea and will probably ask in my journal as well. Thank you.
From:
no subject
Good: they/them
Okay with: anything else. Since I'm actually somewhere between genderfluid and genderless, this stuff really is a bit TOCOTOX (TOo Complicated To eXplain) in RL; I am generally assumed to be female by RL ppl, so I'm used to that, but I'm also fine with a bit of randomness in my pronouns (mix-n-match FTW!).
Uncomfortable: being addressed in terms of gendered group pronouns such as "ma'am" or "ladies" or "fellas" makes me squirm. As does explicitly gendered terms where perfectly acceptable ones are in common use (e.g. wife/husband vs partner, "lady scientist" (just "scientist", plz) etc etc). NB: I have no problem with others using these terms for themselves if they want; it's JUST when they are applied to me that I squirm.
Thanks for asking, BTW. Like I said, for me this stuff is often TOCOTOX in social situations, but I always appreciate being asked in a situation where I have time/sufficient text space to actually explain. :-)
From:
no subject
BTW just read Ann Leckie's "Provenance" which I found very disorienting with gender (or lack of gender)terms. Also confusing was the use of terms like "brother" and "uncle" within this stew of new gender pronouns. Isn't brother a gender linked term? This is NOT to say that I'm against changing gender pronouns, just confused!!
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Entry level: they/them/theirs
Advanced usage: hon/honey/hons
The "entry level" pronouns are for folks who are shifting their mindsets and learning how to use beyond the binary pronouns because I'd rather hear something that is neutral in describing me than hear something that is just plain wrong.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I'm not being picky about it yet (that'll change after I muster the nerve to shave my beard -- and make up my mind about a new name). But that's about accommodating folks who have trouble seeing me as a she while I'm still giving mixed signals, rather than still seeing myself as a ze or a they.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I'm fine with any pronouns traditionally used for persons not objects, extra chuffed when someone creative manages to nonchalantly use binary-gendered pronouns in a way the affirms my queerness. Spivak style or the indefinite "they" are good defaults.
(NOT "they" with singular verbs, please -- if you're considering my comfort, "they is" makes me uncomfortable as hell, same as calling a person "it" - though I'm aware there are people who prefer each of those and I do my best to accommodate their preference when I speak of them.)
Like