I finished one book recently:

Are We Smart Enough to Know How Smart Animals Are? by Frans de Waals. This is an overview of animal cognition--both the subject and some history of the field, by someone who has made it his life's work. A key point here is that animals other than humans--and especially other than primates--have different problems to solve, and different tools with which to do it. For example, humans, chimpanzees, and some kinds of wasps can recognize/distinguish other members of their own species; kittiwakes, a kind of seabird that don't care for their young, don't have or need it.

de Waal points out that sometimes animals look stupid because they evolved to solve different problems than we did, and sometimes it's because scientists have used the wrong tests. So, researchers thought humans can recognize chimpanzees and chimps couldn't, because chimps didn't distinguish *human* faces; meanwhile, most of us can't tell one chimp from another.

Another recurring theme is the moving line of "this is the very important thing that humans can do and animals, sometimes by redefining things like "culture" or "tool use" to exclude what non-human animals have been observed/proven to do.

The author also wonders what "how smart is an octopus?" even means, and how/if we can approach the question in animals with decemtralized nervous systems and no parental care or other social interactions with other members.

This was a fun read, mostly narrative and much of it about the author's own research, focusing on chimpanzees and corvids.

Between the bus trip to and from Montreal, and time spent reading while I was visiting [personal profile] rysmiel, I finished six or seven books in the last week, including one reread.

So:

Periodic Tales: A cultural history of the elements by Hugh Aldersey-Williams: This is basically what it says on the tin, through a personal as well as British lens. This is I think best read as a series of interesting anecdotes, though I went "wait a minute" on enough things, from osmium being "the densest thing known" [me: what about neutronium?] to the claim (in the section on calcium) that the White House was so named for being whitewashed (in the section on calcium) that I would double-check any facts in here before quoting them.

Clockwork Boys (Clocktaur Wars book 1) and The Wonder Engine (Clocktaur Wars book 2), by [personal profile] tkingfisher (This is why it's "six or seven" books: the two parts are novella-length, and book 2 picks up immediately after the end of book 1.) I liked this a lot: it's a fantasy about a kingdom being invaded/ravaged by some magical(?) creatures, and the unlikely group sent in search of some, any, defense after a more plausible group vanished. Demon tattoos enforcing the group's obedience, if not loyalty. The group leader, Slate (a forger who was convicted of treason) recruits someone by asking if he'd like to go on a suicide mission. The story also includes attack tattoos--aimed at the wearers. Also gnoles, and I don't remember which other Kingfisher book they were in.

Unthinkable, by Helen Thomson: Thomson writes about a variety of people with unusual brains as ways of talking about the human mind and brain more generally. The examples include a woman who is always lost, a man with impressively good memory of his past, a man whose schizophrenia makes him believe he is a tiger, people who believe themselves to be dead, and a color-blind man with the kind of synesthesia that sees letters in different colors, whose brain sees colors his eyes cannot. The individual sections were interesting, but it felt as though the whole was less than the sum of the parts; on the other hand, that may depend on how much the reader already knows.

Exhalation, by Ted Chiang: a second collection of Chiang's sf and fantasy stories. I liked it, though there's nothing here as memorable as "Story of Your Life" (which is a pretty high standard of comparison).

Hawk, by Stephen Brust: another Taltos book, a bit more about relationships (and wanting some sort of connection) than some of the previous, as Vlad tries a complicated plan to get the Jhereg to leave him alone.

Wyrd Sisters, by Terry Pratchett: reread of a Discworld novel, which I enjoyed.

redbird: full bookshelves and table in a library (books)
( Jan. 21st, 2015 12:59 pm)
I'm going to try doing "reading Wednesday" posts again, without the "what I plan to read next" section, because I'm bad at predicting that.

Recent reading:

Patricia Wrede and Caroline Stevermer, Sorcery and Cecilia and The Mislaid Magician. These were rereads, mostly during nights when I was having trouble sleeping and wanted something light. Still fun. This is volumes 1 and 3 of a trilogy, because for some reason I don't own volume 2.

Merle A. Reinikka, A History of the Orchid. This is more a history of orchid collecting; I asked the library for it after seeing a mention somewhere, and don't remember the context. I stopped reading partway through, for several reasons, including that there isn't the right kind or level of detail for me; irritation at old-fashioned and even racist language; and the topic not being at the center of my interests. References to "Oriental" plants and using "Western Hemisphere" instead of "Americas" were distracting, but I could accept them in a book from 1970; the phrase that stopped me cold was a reference to European orchid-hunters running into "hostile savages." This on a page where the author also tells the reader how those hunters had destroyed areas of forest and completely eliminated the local populations of orchids; "savage" seems in this context to mean the locals, who weren't European or urbanized. I can't recommend this one even if you're looking for something on this subject.

James Fallon, The Psychopath Inside. This is a first-person memoir by a neurologist/researcher who discovered that his brain scan matched the patterns seen in criminal psychopaths, and started wondering what that meant and why he hadn't done such horrible things. I'd read a magazine-article version of this a couple of years ago. He talks some about gradually realizing/listening to friends and family who told him that no, he really wasn't "normal" in things like his risk tolerance and willingness to ignore possible harm to others.

The author hasn't (from what he writes here, at least) tried to kill or sabotage anyone. But he has left colleagues holding the bag at what were supposed to be joint conference presentations, because he was having fun hanging out at a bar. And he invited his brother to explore a cave with him, concealing the fact that it contained bats that carried a potentially lethal infection. (His brother was not pleased when he stumbled on that fact months later, needless to say.) One bit that fell under "what kind of person says that?" crossed with "ugh, Libertarians" [he identifies as one, and says it's one of the important things he and his wife have in common] was the author's assertion that he's not a monster, so he wouldn't watch a child starve to death in front of him—followed immediately by saying that he would happily eliminate all welfare payments even though he knows it means people would die, because that would be good for the species. So, not ethics but an odd combination of squeamishness with a surprising willingness to admit that he is in favor of people children starving to death.

Agatha Christie, The Body in the Library. I am working my way through the Miss Marple books (I think I read these in my teens, but that's long enough ago that I remember nothing at all about them). This novel is "what it says on the tin" in the sense that Christie says in the introduction that she wanted to write that already-cliched shape of story but only if she could break already-existing expectations for that shape of story. A dead body is found in the library of one of Miss Marple's acquaintances, and the book is about the police, with her assistance, figuring out who the dead woman was, why she was left there, and by whom. As seems to be the pattern here, people who hadn't already known Miss Marple assume she is a stereotypical harmless old lady; her crime-solving "secret," such as it is, is to listen for gossip and assume the worst of everybody.

Jim C. Hines, Codex Born. The continuing adventures of a young "libriomancer," someone whose magic consists of being able to pull things out of books and use them. "Things" can be weapons, healing spells, or almost anything small enough: one of the main characters is a dryad, born from an acorn someone pulled out of a bad fantasy novel. The main constraint is that the same book has to have been read by a lot of people; a magician can't materialize something just by describing it om paper. This is fast-paced and good, but it's definitely the middle book of a trilogy; start with Libriomancer.

Catherynne Valente, Smoky and the feast of Mabon. A sweet but rather earnest picture book about a girl getting lost in the woods and celebrating a pagan holiday; there's a smaller-print introduction that tells the adult reader more about Mabon. This is another book that I grabbed off our shelves because I wanted light reading; [livejournal.com profile] cattitude is a serious Valente fan, which I assume is why we have this, since neither of us is pagan nor do we have children of the age this is aimed at. [personal profile] conuly, you can add this to your list of picture books with protagonists of color, but note the explicit religious content.

Currently reading:

Ann Leckie, Ancillary Justice. I'm about a third of the way through this one, and so far it's very good. More later, or go find any of the write-ups by people who have already finished it. (This won the Hugo and Nebula for best novel for 2014.)

Julie Smith, Death before Facebook. A mystery novel that I downloaded a while ago; my current kindle book. I'm not using the kindle much, for some reason; I wouldn't be surprised if I don't finish this until partway through my next flight to Boston.
What are you reading now?

Cranford, by Elizabeth Gaskell. I'm about two pages into this, so all I can really say is that I like the narrative voice so far. Again, recommended by [livejournal.com profile] papersky and downloaded from Project Gutenberg

Liars and Outliers, by Bruce Schneier. Nonfiction about trust and security; again, I'm only a few pages in.

What did you recently finish reading?

The Spy Princess by Sherwood Smith. A fun story about an 11-year-old princess who gets tangled in rebellion> She spends a chunk of the story in a magical valley, but while it's a refuge, she and everyone else there is well aware of what's going on outside. [This has some implied spoilers for Smith's Inda tetralogy, but not sufficient that I would worry about reading it first.]

The Story of Julia Page by Kathleen Thompson Norris. This one was worth reading for the characterization, and for Norris's ability to keep surprising the reader. It's an early 20th century novel about a woman who grows up in a working class family with relatives who are mostly resigned to their circumstances, but manages to educate herself (in appropriate behavior more than the math/history/grammar sense), and marries a well-off doctor, and what happens afterward. Norris has a good eye for double standards and the limiting effects of sexism: realistically, the protagonist sees that it's unfair, but also sees that no men and few women will agree with her. She's also very much a woman of her time, thinking not that extramarital sex is no big deal, but that it's unfair that while such things are wrong for everyone, socially men get away with it and women don't. Note: there's some careless stereotyping of Chinese-American speech. I will probably read more Norris.

The '44 Vintage, by Anthony Price. This is one of a couple of dozen thrillers about the same characters, of which I have now read three or four; it's set the earliest, but I think was written relatively late. The viewpoint character is a British infantryman, sent to France in early 1944, and given "detached duties" after admitting to knowing German; from there, everything gets rapidly out of control, as many of his apparently comrades turn out to be untrustworthy, and almost everyone's motives are unclear.

Captain Vorpatril's Alliance, by Lois McMaster Bujold. Another Barrayar novel, with Miles (and the rest of the Vorkosigans) entirely offstage. Ivan Vorpatril is very much the same Ivan we've seen in previous books, trying to do well enough to satisfy and never well enough to get noticed. There's a romance tangled into an adventure novel here, but it's not the standard romance plot. It reminded me of John Dickson Carr's The Bride of Newgate, which also involves a hastily arranged wedding (to save the title character's inheritance, in that case) between two people who take for granted that they won't be married in any meaningful sense. Ivan and Tej both find her family somewhat overwhelming, but she does rather better with his mother than he does with hers.

This book is definitely better than Cryoburn; they overlap in time, and neither would be a spoiler for the other. I don't think I'd start with either.

I also read several short stories, one online, a few in back issues of Fantasy and Science Fiction when I had a couple of extra hours at the library, and about a third of an Elisabeth Vonarburg collection, while visiting Montreal last weekend.

What Do You Expect to Read Next?

Hallucinations, by Oliver Sacks, if I don't have to return it to the library too soon. I took out this and the Bujold at the same time, on two-week loan, and have another eight days for it. The Schneier book is the current hardcover/read at home book, and the Gaskell is the kindle book.

[meta: I'm doing these posts only in weeks when they wouldn't be "same as last week."]
.

About Me

redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
Redbird

Most-used tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style credit

Expand cut tags

No cut tags