On Monday,
rysmiel and I walked out of the Metro and saw a couple of people sitting behind a table with a sign saying "Impeach Cheney First." Underneath that, it said they were followers of Lyndon LaRouche, so I just muttered "them" as we headed for dim sum. Then we passed the table again, on our way to Maple Delight for ice cream, and noticed more of their signage, which advocated defeating the Bush agenda by building a land bridge across Beringia. (They didn't use the word Beringia, or any geographic names, but the illustration was clearly of Alaska, Siberia, and the island arc connecting them.) My only guess for what they were doing in Montreal at all is that the Old Port draws a lot of tourists: the harpist busking opposite the cathedral had a US dollar bill at the bottom of her case under the coins.
Friday morning, exiting Penn Station on my way to work, I passed people with a sign that started by asserting that "9/11 was a smokescreen," then went on to add that "Cabot was here before Columbus" (not implausible, depending on exactly how you define "here"--Columbus never came as far north as New York), and advocate annexing the U.S. to Mexico. They had a URL, but I just walked past muttering the phrase that's in the title of this post, and don't plan on checking out their web site. (One of the local dailies had the front-page headline "barking mad," which I think triggered me to think of these people's lunacy in terms of that London reference.)
Friday morning, exiting Penn Station on my way to work, I passed people with a sign that started by asserting that "9/11 was a smokescreen," then went on to add that "Cabot was here before Columbus" (not implausible, depending on exactly how you define "here"--Columbus never came as far north as New York), and advocate annexing the U.S. to Mexico. They had a URL, but I just walked past muttering the phrase that's in the title of this post, and don't plan on checking out their web site. (One of the local dailies had the front-page headline "barking mad," which I think triggered me to think of these people's lunacy in terms of that London reference.)
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
So, I suppose for the general population, they're annoyances, but when they start trying to recruit you, it gets very different, very quickly.
From:
no subject
If they're not allowed at the non-partisan meeting, why don't people check ID cards?
I wonder if they're more careful here since Virginia took most of their money and property away some years back.
From:
no subject
As far as I can work out, they're recruiting mostly young, idealistic, anti-authoritarian people with popular political positions like "stop the war" and "impeach Cheney". And then drawing said vulnerable people into a very scary cult, scary enough that they will react violently against a member who becomes disillusioned.
From:
no subject
Young idealistic anti-authoritarian people have always been easy to recruit. The tricky part is to show them how their current passion is wrong without making them feel like idiots.
From:
no subject
I do agree with you that everything is still in the judicial process and there's no clear proof. Certainly when I made that original post back in 2003, nobody really knew what had happened and it seemed plausible that the group had "only" tormented and terrified Jerry into killing himself. I don't know why the German authorities are being unhelpful in investigating things. But the British police keep conducting new investigations and every few months there's a new story in which more evidence emerges that points towards a deliberate, orchestrated murder. It's still unclear exactly who was behind it with all the tangled bits of cult in several countries trying to hide their connections to eachother.
Good point about giving young people the tools they need to protect themselves without making them feel stupid.
From:
no subject
From: (Anonymous)
no subject
I do remember that some years ago, a famous greyhound was stolen in London and one day someone said, 'You know they found that greyhound?' - question 'Where?' - answer 'Outside Barking'. I can't remember whether they did ever find it. Here is a rare blog entry of mine with pictures of Upminster as punishment:
http://www.margaret-marks.com/Transblawg/archives/001462.html
Please let me know if the expression 'Positively Upminster' has entered the language.
Margaret
From:
no subject
From: (Anonymous)
no subject
>>There is a an old joke - based on the stations on London Underground's district line; "You've got mad, Barking Mad, and Upminster"... "Upminster ?" "Serveral stops beyond Barking".<<
http://blogs.technet.com/jamesone/
Ghits for "upminster mad" or "barking upminster".
Sorry, but I was completely mystified.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Blessings...
inanna :)