The genome of a very common bacterium has been sequenced, and it has only 1354 genes, and apparently none of the redundancy or clutter of the human genome. Pelagibacter ubique doesn't have the smallest genome known, but the smaller ones sequenced are all from obligate parasites. P. ubique floats in the ocean--everywhere in the ocean--billions of billions of individuals.
ETA: That name translates as "Ubiquitous ocean bacterium", if that counts as "translation".
ETA: That name translates as "Ubiquitous ocean bacterium", if that counts as "translation".
From:
no subject
He's also a signator to Project Steve (http://www.(talkorigins.org/faqs/steve/), which is even cooler...)
From:
no subject
I'm not denying that Peligibacter ubique doesn't appear to be very good at what it does, but it's not going to be posting to LJ anytime soon :-).
From:
Gemome sizes
I'm a plant biologist, not a microbiologist, so most of my information is on E. coli and Pseudomonas. Bacteria can pick up extra DNA from other bacteria, even ones that are not really related. That's part of the way antibiotic resistance spreads so fast - the genes are kept on small portable pieces of DNA that get passed around. The genome sizes of wild strains of E. coli are not stable. They can triple in gene content, and they are quite efficient at removing genes that they don't need. Any individual that gets rid of extra DNA first has a slight advantage in energy use over its neighbors, and that adds up quickly.