I just copyedited the Wikipedia article on the an Iranian newspaper, and posted the resulting edit to a public Webserver. This article was created by an Iranian Wikipedian.

Iran is on the list of countries that American citizens are not supposed to trade with, and according to the latest obnoxious statement from the current administration, editing material by citizens of those countries counts.

Fittingly, the article in question is about censorship by the Iranian government.

From: [identity profile] scottscidmore.livejournal.com


Now if the Iranian government doesn't want this article getting wider attention, they and the US Administration could find themselves in cooperation, which may violate some of those restrictions...

You don't suppose we could end up with them arresting themselves or each other?


From: [identity profile] red-queen.livejournal.com


I suspect that opportunities for editing to count as an act of civil disobedience are few and far between. I respect your integrity, not just as a wielder of the editorial pencil, but for standing up for what's right.

From: [identity profile] lsanderson.livejournal.com

It made the Times today...


http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/28/national/28PUBL.html

From: [identity profile] minnehaha.livejournal.com


Good for you.

Although as a test case, it would be better if you were actually paid for your work.

My guess is that the government will back down on this one. It's just too silly.

B
.

About Me

redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
Redbird

Most-used tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style credit

Expand cut tags

No cut tags