Someone over on alt.poly is calling various people who have been disagreeing with her and asking her to share the responsibility for writing understandably (rather than demanding that we read her mind instead of her words) "over-educated". I can't possibly be over-educated: I don't understand quantum mechanics, know almost no African history, and don't know Swahili or Chinese or any of the language of Papua New Guinea. I've never read Proust or Milton, and I don't know the infield-fly rule or how to knit a sweater.
How can anyone since Gutenberg be over-educated, when there's so much to know and so little time to learn it all?
Edit: I strongly recommend the discussion in
wild_irises' journal that grew out of this: http://www.livejournal.com/users/wild_irises/3407.html?view=19791#t19791
How can anyone since Gutenberg be over-educated, when there's so much to know and so little time to learn it all?
Edit: I strongly recommend the discussion in
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
B
From:
no subject
Over-educated is a state of mind. Kind of like Zen, but with more books.
From:
no subject
Oh wait, bored now. Who wants to go shoe shopping? <grin>
From:
no subject
Oh, that's good.
From:
no subject
I resent it the same way I resent being called a bookworm.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
It's very odd when "smart" and "wise" and "clever" can be used as insults, too.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I love that!
It's kind of why I'm alibrarian. While working the reference desk keeps you in touch with all the stuff you don't know, it also makes all the stuff you do know, whether that's learned in an academic setting or elsewhere, useful, or potentially so. And it makes a lot of what you don't know within some kind of reach, if only so you can lead the patron to the books on calculus or Swahili or whatever.
Calculus is one of my "But I don't know ...!" subjects. I barely passed trigonometry and never really had much need for "higher math," being firmly entrenched in the "fuzzy subjects", but I've always wondered about it.
This relates to something I said in
From:
no subject
I don't understand people sometimes. Maybe I shouldn't want to.
From:
no subject
A lot of Americans seem to distrust brains. That's one reason to live in Silicon Valley. Here smart is sexy.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
However, a clever second baseman could theoretically just let the ball drop to the ground at his feet. At this point, the ball is in play, and the runner at first faces a force out at second. So by letting the ball drop, picking it up, stepping on the base, and throwing to first, the defense could pick up an extremely cheap double play on what should have been a simple fly out.
The infield fly rule prevents that specific little bit of cheapness. If it's obvious that it's a weak little fly ball to the infield, the umpire can simply call the batter out, whether the defense actually catches the ball or not, on the assumption that if they don't catch it, they're trying to cheat in that specific way. It only applies if there's a runner on first with fewer than two out, which is what makes the rule look more complex than it really is.
There. Now you know about the infield fly rule. :-)
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Throughout the day, she'd do something that involved learning, from asking, "Does your dog like kids?" to having a story read to her, and I joked, "Ack, stop it! You're learning!" At one point, she said, "I have cranberry juice in my lunch because I'm sick and it helps." I asked, "Bladder infection?" and she nodded. That was all.
Halfway through the day, she had me jot down a note for the parent: "Dear Dad. Today I learned about bladder infections and how to read."
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
A.
From:
There's no Proust
From:
no subject
There's no such thing as over-educated. There's adequately educated, and well-educated. There's Ivory Tower educated. But no such thing as "over"!
I have several reactions to someone like that - I select them semi-randomly.
First reaction - ignore them.
Second reaction - point out that communication is a two-way street, using the most reasonable language I can. Try to educate them.
Third reaction - if they're going to insist on using language in a fashion that many people demonstrably can't understand - I'll play it back at them. I'll will use the most convoluted, contrived, jargon-laden language that I can put together - and then when they complain, I pull a side-by-side. Their message, our complaints vs. my message, their complaint. If they can't see the similarity, then I ignore them as much as possible.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject