Dennis Duncan's Index, A History of the is excellent, and if the title sounds at all appealing I recommend it.
The author goes into useful detail on things that many people barely notice. Chapter 3, "Where Would We Be Without It?" is subtitled "the miracle of the page number," including the move to greater specificity, from "this is in the second printed signature" to "look on the fifteenth physical page" to the page numbers we take for granted, where the front and back of that physical page have separate numbers.
The book is also about the long history of people worrying that readers will read indexes, tables of contents, and other summaries rather than the whole book in the order the author wrote it, and the contrasting approach of Pliny's "My lord, I know you are too busy to read my whole book, here is a summary that I hope will be useful" and Samuel Richardson's lengthy index to the moral lessons of his novel Clarissa.
We end (for now) with search engines, including the limits of the mechanical "indexing" that produces something close to a concordance. We can tell a computer "find everything that includes the word 'elephant,' or 'prodigal,'" and it won't find things would seem obvious to a human indexer, or the person who made the request, like mammoth corpses frozen for thousands of years under "elephant" or the parable of the prodigal son for "prodigal."
This book is for people whose reaction to "Point of Order: on Alphabetical Arrangement" is "I didn't know there was that much to say about alphabetical order" rather than "come on, a whole chapter about alphabetical order?!"
The author goes into useful detail on things that many people barely notice. Chapter 3, "Where Would We Be Without It?" is subtitled "the miracle of the page number," including the move to greater specificity, from "this is in the second printed signature" to "look on the fifteenth physical page" to the page numbers we take for granted, where the front and back of that physical page have separate numbers.
The book is also about the long history of people worrying that readers will read indexes, tables of contents, and other summaries rather than the whole book in the order the author wrote it, and the contrasting approach of Pliny's "My lord, I know you are too busy to read my whole book, here is a summary that I hope will be useful" and Samuel Richardson's lengthy index to the moral lessons of his novel Clarissa.
We end (for now) with search engines, including the limits of the mechanical "indexing" that produces something close to a concordance. We can tell a computer "find everything that includes the word 'elephant,' or 'prodigal,'" and it won't find things would seem obvious to a human indexer, or the person who made the request, like mammoth corpses frozen for thousands of years under "elephant" or the parable of the prodigal son for "prodigal."
This book is for people whose reaction to "Point of Order: on Alphabetical Arrangement" is "I didn't know there was that much to say about alphabetical order" rather than "come on, a whole chapter about alphabetical order?!"
Tags:
From:
no subject
and there's a whole chapter about alphabetical order? HURRAY
From:
no subject
I think I need to read this book.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I would absolutely add an index to the moral lessons in my novels if I thought even a single person would be interested.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I'm also curious about how well the book's real, human-created index works in that format. Duncan talks about the ways indexes do, and don't, work in ebooks. part of the problem is that most publishers aren't doing the work that would be needed to make an index work well when the author, indexer, and publisher don't know what electronic page, containing a changing number of words and images, an index entry should point to. This is doable, it's a solved problem, and I've worked on books whose indexes were laid out that way, but many publishers of ebooks don't bother.
From:
no subject
Agreed, IME it's a solved problem. Though the ways I've done it aren't necessarily practical for most trade books or the occasional fictional text (similar tooling for footnotes/endnotes), handling it in ways trade publishers could sustain is really not that bad. Grump.