In between working on manuscripts and discussing at least vaguely-related matters (like sf and other book awards) at the NYRSF work weekend yesterday, I found myself in a discussion of whether/why the US is more violent than other countries. And thinking about it later, I realized that what I'd been unhappy with in Eugene's theories wasn't just that they were single-variable, but that they assumed that the US is exceptional. And it's not just that there are problems with the specific exceptions that were being claimed, but that the last few hundred years of science are a series of lessons in not assuming that your situation or location is a special case.
The point here, if I have one, isn't that all cultures are the same: it's that they're all different, and in several different ways, and it's unlikely to be useful to divide everything into plaid and not-plaid, or assume that there is one important way in which one society is unlike all others, and that this explains all the differences between it and any given other society.
I've also been doing some noodling about relationships and such, but that's mostly in comments to
rysmiel's recent posts.
The point here, if I have one, isn't that all cultures are the same: it's that they're all different, and in several different ways, and it's unlikely to be useful to divide everything into plaid and not-plaid, or assume that there is one important way in which one society is unlike all others, and that this explains all the differences between it and any given other society.
I've also been doing some noodling about relationships and such, but that's mostly in comments to