I got email this morning telling me to log in for information about a change in my submission's status. THey have rejected my appeal, and will send me the explanation by post in 15-20 days, after which I have 60 days to appeal, if I want.

So, next week I will call my lawyer, and ask him whether I need to do anything now, or just wait for the letter so I know what I'm arguing with. I am oddly calm about this round of bad news.

(There was a message on Thursday that led to a page that said both that there was an unspecified change in my application's status, and that they had begun a medical review in August 2023, with nothing more recent. I was going to call the lawyer yesterday, but decided I wasn't up for a possible long phone conversation. As it turns out, that call would have been a waste of my and the lawyer's time. Sometimes procrastinating has value.
Yesterday's mail contained two envelopes from the Social Security disability determination office for Massachusetts. One of them asks about any medical care I've received since the last paperwork I filed, and the other looks like a form I sent them at an earlier stage of this. That would make sense given that I asked them to reconsider turning me down. [personal profile] cattitude pointed out that the first thing I should do is call the lawyer who is representing me about this, so I put everything back in the envelope and wrote myself a reminder to call him today.

I called the lawyer this afternoon, and after saying he was glad I had called him right away, he asked me a bunch of questions. It took me a little while to realize that he was filling out the form as we talked, but at the end of the call he said he would fax the form over to them right away.

The lawyer also said that I can wait to update the medical information; I'd thought they might at least want to know about the pulmonologist. I did describe the balance PT, but I don't know if he added it to the "function report"; I didn't give him the therapist's name. There's no point giving them the name of my new neurologist yet, since so far I'm just a name in his appointment book.

I made that appointment with the neurologist at about 10:00 this morning, when the MS clinic at Beth Israel Lahey called me. I will be seeing him on March 21st, and somewhere between now and then I will look up the address ("Shapiro clinic, 8th floor") and the doctor's first name. Jacobson is a moderately common name, but I assume that if there were two doctors Jacobson there the scheduler would have given me his full name.
This morning, Rep. Pressley's office sent me a PDF of the denial letter.

With that in hand, I sent messages to two law firms that handle denials of social security disability applications and are in or near Boston.

One of the lawyers called me back at about a quarter of two this afternoon. I talked to him, and then he sent me forms to sign and send back, authorizing him to act on my behalf about my disability claim; giving permission for him to see medical records that would otherwise be protected by HIPAA; and agreeing that if the appeal succeeds, he will be paid a percentage of any back benefits.

Then he called me back, and asked me a bunch of questions about my medications, doctors, and what if anything had changed since I filed the application, and used those to file the appeal online.

So, I can stop worrying about that 60-day deadline.

The next step is that the agency will assign a new examiner. Then they will send me more forms to fill out, and send the lawyer copies of everything because I have designated him as my representative. I figure that part of what I would be paying for is persistence: he won't get discouraged by delays or bad news, and he doesn't have executive function issues to interfere with getting things done. (For unsuccessful appeals, all the can charge is "reasonable" costs, determined by the agency, not the law firm.)
Thanks to my congresswoman's office, I now have (a PDF of) the letter saying that Social Security is denying my application for disability benefits. That is dated June 6th. The only thing that's clear about reasons (beyond that they turn down a lot of people) is that they couldn't reach the psychiatrist I was seeing for three years. However, it took me about three minutes this morning to find a phone number for her at the VA hospital, so I can provide that information.

I sent messages to two attorneys who handle this sort of case in the Boston area, and hope to hear back from one of them in the next day or so.

ETA: One of them has already called me back about an hour ago. He will be sending me paperwork so I can designate him as my representative, and other paperwork so he can talk to my doctors. He has an office in Braintree, but when I said I'd rather do a video appointment, he said we could do that or over the telephone, so we will schedule a call or zoom or something.

Also, looking at it again, they not only didn't find Dr. Segal, I don't know whether they talked to my current neurologist. It says they got information from "Mt Auburn neurology" and from one previous neurologist, Dr. Katz.
I'm still waiting for the letter explaining their decision, which was promised on June 7th.

So, I used the contact form on Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley's official website yesterday to ask for help with Social Security, saying that what I need right now is to get that letter, because I'm looking at a deadline for appealing. I got an answer in about an hour, from a staffer who said they would work on this for me, and will get in touch when they have more information. The email went into just enough detail that they clearly read my message and know what I needed, it's not a generic "thank you for contacting us about social security."

I've used Pressley's website (and my previous representatives) several times, to send messages asking them to support or oppose some legislation, or thank them for something they've done or said. This is the first time I've asked for help with a federal agency, but I knew it was there.
Unsurprising but still disappointing, the Social Security Administration has denied my disability claim.

For added annoyance, this information came in the form of an email saying "we have made a decision, log in to see it or wait for a letter in the mail." After some trouble logging in I was told to call to get the answer. I then spent about three minutes on the phone, most of it listening to a recording tell me how the process complied with the Paperwork Reduction Act, and that the whole thing would take about two minutes, and wouldn't I like to use their website instead.

So, what I know now is that someone made a medical decision to turn me down, and I will have sixty days to appeal the decision. That is a problem for next week, after I get the letter. *sigh*

It doesn't help that the air quality is unhealthy for sensitive people, which includes me. The alert has been extended from midnight last night until midnight tonight; I woke up coughing at five a.m.
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
( Feb. 3rd, 2023 01:09 pm)
I finished the "activities of daily living" questionnaire yesterday afternoon, and [personal profile] cattitude stayed up late last night to finish his questionnaire about me. [personal profile] adrian_turtle girded her loins, went out into the cold, and mailed them at the post office this morning.

I am still, or again, feeling stressed, but at least there's nothing I need to do about this for a while, so it doesn't matter if I'm a bit distracted for a day or three.

I did call the person at their office after lunch, and left a message telling her that we had mailed back all the forms either yesterday or this morning, because it might help and can't hurt.
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
( Feb. 1st, 2023 02:27 pm)
I am very glad I kept calling the person whose name and number were on the letter about disability determination, which said "we have to hear from you by Feb. 4th," because when I got through she said my forms were already overdue. I said "I have a letter here dated Jan 25 that says you have to hear from me by the fourth," and then I explained about the forms having first gone to the wrong address. You'd think she'd be aware of what was being sent out with her name, or at least not have incorrect beliefs about it.

However, I told her that one set are going back this afternoon and that I may need a couple of days for the other; gave her my new psychiatrist's name and contact info; and found out where to send the forms back to, and also that yes I can attach additional pages with typed answers (I thought I could, but it didn't say).

Each questionnaire came with a large business reply envelope, the kind with an address window, and nothing telling me what should be showing in that window. The address the examiner gave me is on the top of the letter, in small print, so not something I could use in that window. I measured, wrote the address on a plain sheet of white paper, tried it in the envelope, and redid it half an inch up and a little to the right. Then I made multiple copies, for the other things we need to send them. I don't know if there was supposed to be a sheet of paper with that neatly printed, or if this is one more random way to unofficially disqualify applicants.

I finished the "work record" questionnaire this morning, and [personal profile] cattitude has taken it to the post office. I havealso drafted answers to most of the questions in the stress-inducing "tell us all about what you can no longer do" "function" questionnaire, but some bits are just "[come back to this"] or ["ask Adrian"]. And Cattitude has drafted his answers to the similar one they sent him, as a person I identified as able to talk about my disability.

[I had posted this and some other recent posts on this subject access-list-only, for no particular reason, and just unlocked them.]
I have completed the "work history" forms, and will mail that tomorrow. I'm partway through a first draft of the more complicated and emotionally strenuous one that asks what I can do, what I can't do anymore, and so on. They overlap, because this one asks about how my condition affects my ability to work.

First draft because while there are a few straightforward questions (who do you live with? do you drive?) there are a lot more like "do you prepare meals? how frequently? how long does it take" and "what do you do all day?"

Today's mail had a letter telling me that they'd sent the previous large envelopes, and asking me to call and let them know whether I want to add any medical providers (yes) and when am I going to return the forms? I left a message, asking the "disability examiner" to call me back. I hope to be able to tell her something like "I'm going to send this one back today, and hope to send the other tomorrow. My new psychiatrist is $name, at the same number as you had for my previous psychiatrist, and she has access to the previous doctor's charts."

Also, I had to cross out and re-write some things on the "work history" form because I'd put the numbers on the wrong lines. This despite doing a first draft on my computer, because that's not something I first-drafted. On the other hand, one of the things I'm telling them is that I make more mistakes than I used to...
I got a call a few days ago from someone at the Social Security "disability determination" office, following up on forms they'd sent me and not gotten back. They hadn't gotten the forms back because, even though I gave them a change of address last summer, they sent everything to our old address in Belmont. I told them that yes, I am still interested in pursuing this claim, please send the forms to my current address. This was all reasonable, but still not a cheerful conversation.

Two envelopes arrived in yesterday's mail. One of them asks me about my work history, which they also seem to have lost, in this case after I submitted it online.

The other envelope contained a multi-page form with lots of questions about what I can and cannot do. This is not going to be a cheerful process, and I have to send everything back by February 4th. I think we will take this to the post office and hand it over the counter, rather than risk someone breaking into a mailbox.

Also, everything has to be printed or typed using black or dark-blue ink. That effectively means it all has to be hand-written, because we no longer have a typewriter, and neither do many other private homes.

So far, I have answered the utterly straightforward factual questions on the first page, namely my social security number and daytime phone number. (They have both of those, too.) But doing that little bit means I have started on the process, which may make it easier to do more tomorrow.
I just learned that "The Disability Determination Service (DDS) started a medical review of your application on July 16, 2022. We expect this review to take 7 months."

That counts as progress, albeit slow.
It took a few calls, but I have now spoken to the woman whose name and number were on the letter I got last week.

It turns out that what I need to mail them is: nothing. The online application is complete, and after looking at my earnings report, she said the last few years of freelance work, everything since 2014, don't count as "substantial gainful activity," so she doesn't need the 2021 tax return to tell her that last year's freelance income isn't "substantial gainful activity" either.

I think the process here is: tomorrow morning she will write a "work report" based on what I told her, about having stopped looking for full-time work because I realized I couldn't handle a full-time job, and what the Social Security Administration already knows about my work history. That goes to the local disability determination office, which assigns it to an examiner. The examiner will contact my doctors for medical records, which will then be looked at by a doctor or doctors who work for them.

Somewhere in there, I will probably get a call from an examiner, or a letter asking me to call them. They may want me to be examined by a doctor who works for Social Security, but when I said "fine, if I can keep my N95 mask on" the woman said I could ask for telemedicine.

I asked how long this was likely to take, and while she doesn't know exactly -- among other things, this may depend on how efficient three or four different medical offices are -- if I haven't heard by the end of May, I should call back.


For my reference: My contact is Read more... )
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
( Mar. 31st, 2022 04:05 pm)
I'm applying for Social Security disability (SSDI)

I got a letter from the social security administration today, telling me that I needed to complete my disability application b April 27th. I hadn't realized that starting an online application also started some sort of clock. I'd paused, and saved my work, several times, including once to see whether it would behave better on Chrome than on Firefox.

The letter says "please go online and complete" two specific forms, which are the application and consent for my doctors to send them info. So I did that, adding a couple of sentences and the date of an upcoming medical appointment. Then I saved and/or printed almost every page of the application, just in case.

The next paragraph of their letter says "you must send us the original records," but I'm not entirely sure of what they're asking for. I think it means we need to do our 2021 income tax, so I can send them a copy. The letter gives a specific person (name and phone number/extension), so I called and left a message asking what if anything I need to send by that deadline.

I think that's all the application forms I need to complete and send in for the time being -- the other recent ones were the German naturalization application, apartment rental applications, and (minor) the application to have the company that makes the T cell test waive my fees.
.

About Me

redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
Redbird

Most-used tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style credit

Expand cut tags

No cut tags