redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
( Mar. 21st, 2022 12:37 pm)
After the three of us had put in our most recent (and successful) application for a lease, and [personal profile] cattitude and [personal profile] adrian_turtle mentioned having unfrozen their credit reports for the purpose, and then re-frozen them afterwards, I realized that I should do likewise, which meant creating three accounts.

Experian was straightforward.

The Equifax site kept telling me "invalid email address." Either they don't believe in my ISP, or their system assumes that nobody has a two-letter username. Panix isn't a huge ISP, but it's not a single-user vanity domain, and I'm far from the only Panix user with a two- or three-leter username. So, I have an Equifax account using my gmail address.

The TransUnion website had a weird bug on the sign-up page, with blank white space instead of either a pull-down menu or a text field for "state" in the address. I tried switching browsers, to no avail. I tried again the next day, still nothing.

This morning they had fixed that bug, so I signed up and froze my credit there as well.
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
( May. 21st, 2019 10:05 pm)
I posted a couple of weeks ago about the idonethis site having told me my free account was going away.

Somehow, I now have two free email-only accounts, which are emailing me at different times of day to ask that I reply with what I've done that day, and list past accomplishment. They each have a link to click to turn the emails off, but when I clicked on that, for the more recently created one, the web page told me my free trial had expired.

This is annoying; I would like to keep getting the emails that connect to/draw on the account I've had there for years, but not the other, and I suspect that's impossible without paying them (at least) $5/month. They're both being sent to the same email address, and from the same address, so I don't think I can use email filters here, and I suspect that if I do figure out how to contact someone there, they'll turn off the emails/account I'd like to keep, too.
redbird: me with purple hair (purple)
( Sep. 9th, 2010 09:56 pm)
In fact, I have been to the gym, where Emilie and I did a bunch of stuff, including her doing massage that helped, or was meant to help, various sore bits. That includes the wrist which was hurting last night and the night before; it's been okay today, but when I described the situation she offered to look at it.

Other than that, I did a little cardio, and we did a bunch of familiar stuff, including refreshers on both of last week's new things; a thing that's supposed to help my back muscles, by sort of squeezing them toward each other; and a triceps exercise. The right shoulder was tensing up more than usual; after a little while I realized that this might be because I was mousing right-handed for a change.

At work, we have now been shown how the new system for tracking time off and a few other things (like keeping addresses and lists of dependents/beneficiaries up to date) works/will work. One more paper timesheet, on the 15th, and then it should be electronic. The site has an "upcoming events" spot, so I now know that we will be getting flu shots at the office again, this year on October 20. Not being in a high-risk group, I can wait that long (I could have it at my choice of drug store chains right away, if I was willing to spend $25-30).

We also got to play a little with the new content management system. It is slow and poorly designed, in ways including pointless nested folders that we'll have to click through. cut for complaints about stupid design. )
I have a new credit card. (The physical object is new; the account is not.) Having called the automated service to activate the card (that's a plausible security thing: it checks that you're calling from the registered home phone number [1], and doesn't take a lot of time or effort), I turned the card over, picked up a ballpoint pen, and signed in the usual place.

After doing so, I realized that my signature was hard to read, and thus to check, because it's blue ballpoint (one of the two standard colors) on a strip that has, for reasons that I am inclined to classify as security theatre, the word "VISA" printed, over and over, in alternating blue and orange [2]. If I'd looked first, I might have used a black pen, which would have made it hard for me to read the three-digit security code, which is printed on that strip in black. The strip itself is long enough for my name (my surname is ten letters long), but anyone signing a name longer than "Kim Oh" or maybe "Pat Lee" is likely to be writing on or below the security code. (A longer first name, or a letter like "t" or "l" in the surname would increase the chance of collision.)

The easy fix for this would have been to move the security code all the way to the right edge of the signature strip. Or to use, say, green and orange if they felt they had to print "VISA VISA VISA" all over the signature strip.

Looking at the card it replaced, and my other credit card, I see that the blue and orange seems standard. The location of the security code is not; my other card does in fact have it flush right.

[1] Yes, there are ways to spoof your outgoing number, but it at least requires a hypothetical thief to know what that number is.

[2] Even if cashiers are still checking signatures, as few do, they're probably not going to be looking for that design (note that cashiers in most places are pressured to check people out as fast as possible), so it doesn't actually prevent a thief from peeling off and replacing the signature strip. It certainly wouldn't be difficult to get a color printer to produce something close enough to fool a casual observer.
I have a new credit card. (The physical object is new; the account is not.) Having called the automated service to activate the card (that's a plausible security thing: it checks that you're calling from the registered home phone number [1], and doesn't take a lot of time or effort), I turned the card over, picked up a ballpoint pen, and signed in the usual place.

After doing so, I realized that my signature was hard to read, and thus to check, because it's blue ballpoint (one of the two standard colors) on a strip that has, for reasons that I am inclined to classify as security theatre, the word "VISA" printed, over and over, in alternating blue and orange [2]. If I'd looked first, I might have used a black pen, which would have made it hard for me to read the three-digit security code, which is printed on that strip in black. The strip itself is long enough for my name (my surname is ten letters long), but anyone signing a name longer than "Kim Oh" or maybe "Pat Lee" is likely to be writing on or below the security code. (A longer first name, or a letter like "t" or "l" in the surname would increase the chance of collision.)

The easy fix for this would have been to move the security code all the way to the right edge of the signature strip. Or to use, say, green and orange if they felt they had to print "VISA VISA VISA" all over the signature strip.

Looking at the card it replaced, and my other credit card, I see that the blue and orange seems standard. The location of the security code is not; my other card does in fact have it flush right.

[1] Yes, there are ways to spoof your outgoing number, but it at least requires a hypothetical thief to know what that number is.

[2] Even if cashiers are still checking signatures, as few do, they're probably not going to be looking for that design (note that cashiers in most places are pressured to check people out as fast as possible), so it doesn't actually prevent a thief from peeling off and replacing the signature strip. It certainly wouldn't be difficult to get a color printer to produce something close enough to fool a casual observer.
.

About Me

redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
Redbird

Most-used tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style credit

Expand cut tags

No cut tags