As seems to be standard, I've got a mix of people whose names I recognize (and in some cases share LJ communities with) and complete strangers; no maintenance-type communities, because I have them all on my friends list already.
Closest 50 non-Friends for
TrustFlow trust metric
Created byClosest 50 non-Friends for
redbird:
1:
crystalizethis, 2:
akicif, 3:
rosefox, 4:
pnh, 5:
serendipoz, 6:
dmw, 7:
major_clanger, 8:
kalmn, 9:
spikeiowa, 10:
wandra, 11:
numbat, 12:
tamaranth, 13:
livejardin, 14:
del_c, 15:
wcg, 16:
catabolism, 17:
patsycat, 18:
patio_gardens, 19:
swisstone, 20:
rozk, 21:
lcohen, 22:
gardening, 23:
horticulture, 24:
matociquala, 25:
the_magician, 26:
juliebata, 27:
residentevil666, 28:
malwen, 29:
lsanderson, 30:
groliffe, 31:
libertango, 32:
bigdaddyfluff, 33:
kittyland, 34:
rmjwell, 35:
bcholmes, 36:
davidschroth, 37:
pmcmurray, 38:
jinian, 39:
ang_grrr, 40:
autopope, 41:
daedala, 42:
diony, 43:
kijjohnson, 44:
gummitch, 45:
flyingsauce, 46:
melymbrosia, 47:
daegaer, 48:
dougs, 49:
flickgc, 50:
dalmeny
Please comment in my journal on how you found this tool and what you think of it - thanks!
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
B
From:
no subject
"Trust" is an odd name for it, if only because it winds up telling all my friends that they should trust things like
From:
no subject
Well, shouldn't they? :-D
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
For LJ, this would mean that the person who is most often on the Friend's List of my Friends is on the top of his list. Right?
B
From:
no subject
"Trust" does seem to be a strange thing to call it.
From:
no subject
And "trust" does seem to be a misnomer. But it is a weird kind of handshaking distance.
B
From:
no subject
There have been discussions all over LJ about how the algorithm works, with much scratching of heads. I am considering starting the Journal of Probabilistic Bucket Related Results..
From:
no subject
(You are the most garden-y so far with what looks like suggestions for 4 gardening communities?)
From:
no subject
B