Machu Picchu isn't very old either, according to the latest theories. Check out this (http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/18/science/social/18INCA.html?ex=1048568400&en=712f0554b334e265&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE) for more info.
And no, I don't know the answer to your question. Interesting one, though. *grin*
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
From:
no subject
But the question seems to have been based on a common confusion, anyhow: as noted earlier in this thread, Baghdad isn't even that old.
From:
no subject
And no, I don't know the answer to your question. Interesting one, though. *grin*