![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
In the discussion of the decision about Jim Frenkel, a lot of people are interpreting this as "he is definitely banned for 2015, after that we'll see, and he can come back in 2019 unless something else happens." At least one person I know is interpreting it as "he is definitely banned until 2018, and then we'll decide whether he can come back in 2019 or later."
Separately from what would constitute good evidence: if nothing changes, and you don't hear from Jim Frenkel in any way, shape, or form between now and April 2016, would he be allowed to attend Wiscon in May 2016?
If he presented no evidence in his favor, and nobody else presented any further evidence against him, would he be welcome at the end of those four years?
[I have put the same post on the Dreamwidth Wiscon community]
ETA: I had meant to post this to the Wiscon community, not my own journal, and have now put it there as well.
Separately from what would constitute good evidence: if nothing changes, and you don't hear from Jim Frenkel in any way, shape, or form between now and April 2016, would he be allowed to attend Wiscon in May 2016?
If he presented no evidence in his favor, and nobody else presented any further evidence against him, would he be welcome at the end of those four years?
[I have put the same post on the Dreamwidth Wiscon community]
ETA: I had meant to post this to the Wiscon community, not my own journal, and have now put it there as well.