There are four bald eagle chicks, about 8 or 9 weeks old, in hacking boxes (that's a falconry term--basically, it means they're in 6-by-6-by-6 boxes), on a platform in the tree canopy in Inwood Hill Park. (That's the park across the street from me, for anyone coming in late.)

The goal is to reintroduce the bald eagle to Manhattan. We went to a talk by the falconer working on the project, yesterday.

Many people apparently think the idea is crazy--but, he says, they said the same thing about Washington, D.C., and there are now two bald eagle nests in the District of Columbia, near the Capitol building.

Anyhow.

These are third chicks from eagle nests in Wisconsin. It's rare for three chicks to survive from a clutch, so this gives them a better chance of making it to fledging than they otherwise had.

We were warned not to expect much: most bald eagle chicks don't live through the first year.

If all goes well, though, we will have eagles in Manhattan. The red-tailed hawk who is nesting nearby is likely to harass them, but not successfully: a female bald eagle has a 6- to 7-foot wingspan. (Males are about a third smaller, in this and most raptor species.)

They're being fed fish, which is definitely a normal bald eagle diet, in the hope that when they start flying and seeking their own food, they'll keep fishing. (They have easy access to the Hudson River.) On the other hand, they might decide that rats, or ducks, or even (he warned us) swans look tasty.

Bald eagles don't breed until they're four or five years old--but if an adult eagle sees these, she's more likely to decide to nest in the area. And they might decide to return when they're old enough, if all goes well and they make it that far. The plan is to bring in four chicks a year for four or five years.

The most visible sign of the project, at the moment, is a fenced area in the hills, with a sign saying "Endangered species" and warning that they're protected by state and federal law. The area will be "closed indefinitely", but August is a likely end-date for that.

The eagles will be getting telemetry, and a Web cam.

Birdly goodness indeed. The peregrines have been a great success in the city (though their traditional nest sites in the Palisades are now occupied by owls); the Canada geese have rebounded so successfully that they're considered a pest by many people; there's room for bald eagles here again.
Tags:
There are four bald eagle chicks, about 8 or 9 weeks old, in hacking boxes (that's a falconry term--basically, it means they're in 6-by-6-by-6 boxes), on a platform in the tree canopy in Inwood Hill Park. (That's the park across the street from me, for anyone coming in late.)

The goal is to reintroduce the bald eagle to Manhattan. We went to a talk by the falconer working on the project, yesterday.

Many people apparently think the idea is crazy--but, he says, they said the same thing about Washington, D.C., and there are now two bald eagle nests in the District of Columbia, near the Capitol building.

Anyhow.

These are third chicks from eagle nests in Wisconsin. It's rare for three chicks to survive from a clutch, so this gives them a better chance of making it to fledging than they otherwise had.

We were warned not to expect much: most bald eagle chicks don't live through the first year.

If all goes well, though, we will have eagles in Manhattan. The red-tailed hawk who is nesting nearby is likely to harass them, but not successfully: a female bald eagle has a 6- to 7-foot wingspan. (Males are about a third smaller, in this and most raptor species.)

They're being fed fish, which is definitely a normal bald eagle diet, in the hope that when they start flying and seeking their own food, they'll keep fishing. (They have easy access to the Hudson River.) On the other hand, they might decide that rats, or ducks, or even (he warned us) swans look tasty.

Bald eagles don't breed until they're four or five years old--but if an adult eagle sees these, she's more likely to decide to nest in the area. And they might decide to return when they're old enough, if all goes well and they make it that far. The plan is to bring in four chicks a year for four or five years.

The most visible sign of the project, at the moment, is a fenced area in the hills, with a sign saying "Endangered species" and warning that they're protected by state and federal law. The area will be "closed indefinitely", but August is a likely end-date for that.

The eagles will be getting telemetry, and a Web cam.

Birdly goodness indeed. The peregrines have been a great success in the city (though their traditional nest sites in the Palisades are now occupied by owls); the Canada geese have rebounded so successfully that they're considered a pest by many people; there's room for bald eagles here again.
Tags:
redbird: a red bird: tattoo of a cardinal (tattoo)
( Jun. 24th, 2002 10:54 am)
Testing, again.

I just installed an LJ client on my system,

Go back to the previous entry: it has much birdly goodness.
redbird: a red bird: tattoo of a cardinal (tattoo)
( Jun. 24th, 2002 10:54 am)
Testing, again.

I just installed an LJ client on my system,

Go back to the previous entry: it has much birdly goodness.
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
( Jun. 24th, 2002 01:31 pm)
I got a charming email from DDB an hour or two ago--an emailed rassef award, so as not to spoil the effect of the post he was responding to. This all related to a recent troll invasion.

I sent him a thank you.

And got email from an "automated spam reduction system," asking me to confirm that I was a real person and wanted to email him. I did, but grumpily: a decent version of this system would automatically add people the user had written to, rather than demanding people qualify when replying to him.

I included a grumble to this effect in my reply, but I suspect that's not read by a human being.
Tags:
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
( Jun. 24th, 2002 01:31 pm)
I got a charming email from DDB an hour or two ago--an emailed rassef award, so as not to spoil the effect of the post he was responding to. This all related to a recent troll invasion.

I sent him a thank you.

And got email from an "automated spam reduction system," asking me to confirm that I was a real person and wanted to email him. I did, but grumpily: a decent version of this system would automatically add people the user had written to, rather than demanding people qualify when replying to him.

I included a grumble to this effect in my reply, but I suspect that's not read by a human being.
Tags:
.

About Me

redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
Redbird

Most-used tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style credit

Expand cut tags

No cut tags