A couple of days ago, [livejournal.com profile] nellorat mentioned some research saying that yes, exercise tends to increase life expectancy, and the amount of increase is about equal to the amount of time spent exercising. My thought was "cool, the gym time is basically free," but I realized that this only works because I enjoy most of what I'm doing there. If not, it could very easily be read as no net benefit.

I realize that life expectancy isn't the only variable. It's not my main exercise goal: I'm mostly working on strength, endurance, balance, a feeling of being in control, and a side order of endorphins. And even if the time spent exercising was "free" in that sense, the extra commuting time and such aren't. But it's still a pleasing thought. As far as I know, other things I enjoy, such as reading, don't come with that bonus in life expectancy.

I went to the gym yesterday after work. Exercising is fun, but the details are often boring, so cut as usual.
Cardio, 10:00, top heart rate 120
Squat leaning on ball, 2 sets of 15
Calf raise with ball, 15
Chest press, 50 pounds, 12; 45 pounds, 7
Hip adduction, 90 pounds, 2 sets of 13

Biceps curls sitting on ball, 10 pounds each hand, 20, 12
Crunches lying on ball with feet against wall, 9, 5
A bit of balance work, standing one-footed on a squishy piece of foam
Rowing (on ball), 35 pounds, 15, 15, 9
Stretches
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

.

About Me

redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
Redbird

Most-used tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style credit

Expand cut tags

No cut tags