I had an interview this morning with a company called PES, which creates certification and credentialing tests. They're looking for an editor, with proofreading and stuff.

I talked to the HR person. I did a weird "problem solving" test, odd math stuff, simple arithmetic, word things like "do these two words mean similar things, opposite things, or unrelated things", which apparently they give to all applicants and then mostly ignore, unless they need a tie-breaker.

I took a short copyediting test: 20 minutes, a page of stuff of the sort I'd actually be working on, to be edited for consistency, spelling, etc. (instructions deliberately vague).

Then I talked to the two people who actually run the editing department, who I'd be working with if I'm hired. We talked about what I did at ACM, and the freelance work I mentioned in my cover letter. We talked about what the job involves. We talked about the eagles in Inwood Hill Park (I didn't bring that up, Tim did). We talked about legacy systems. They asked if I know vi, and happily put a note on my resume when I said yes. Not something I'd thought to list under "skills".

They asked about salary; I told them what I made at ACM; they said we should be all right. They told me about benefits, and I clarified that I had come from another non-profit.

The work looks reasonably interesting, and something I can handle. The location is good, for me (120th, near Broadway, an easy trip down on the #1).

They hope to have a decision by the end of next week.

From: [identity profile] rivka.livejournal.com


Wow, that sounds like it went as well as it possibly could have. Congratulations on having such a great interview! I'll keep sending good vibes in your general direction.

From: [identity profile] roadnotes.livejournal.com


Oh, that sounds wonderful. I'm hoping for the best.

Dangerously close to Mondel's, isn't that?

From: [identity profile] holyoutlaw.livejournal.com


Yeah! Congratulations on a good interview! Fingers crossed for you and the job.

From: [identity profile] purpletigron.livejournal.com

Re: I don't know how many people they're interviewing


In UK academia, they'll interview upwards of 6 candidates for a research position, starting at 09:00 and going on as late as it takes, and make up their mind before breaking up for the evening.

I'm not saying this is good, sensible, admirable, or whatever - it's just what I've been used to in the past!

From: [identity profile] nolly.livejournal.com


Good luck!

Of the two companies ho actually made me offers, one took less than a week (the one I accepted); the other took about 2 months. The ones who rejected me mostly let me know within a couple of weeks; one took 6 weeks or more, but that's because the prime contractor was being difficult (which is ultimately why I didn't get the job), and one I simply never heard from again.

From: [identity profile] filkerdave.livejournal.com


Here's to hoping that the decision is a wise one and they realize that you're perfect for it!

From: [identity profile] webbob.livejournal.com

Very promising!


Is this the less academically polished side of "Princeton Educational Services," who bring us more scholastic standardized tests such as the GRE?
.

About Me

redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
Redbird

Most-used tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style credit

Expand cut tags

No cut tags