Entry tags:
(no subject)
I suspect I'm the only person whose reaction to that "50 significant sf/fantasy books" list/meme is the increasing feeling that it's time I reread Dhalgren.
I am also wondering why Shiras's Children of the Atom is on there, since nobody is saying they've read it.
I am also wondering why Shiras's Children of the Atom is on there, since nobody is saying they've read it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
It's a frustrating list: I can't find any explanation of what was used to define "significant", but given that the list has Terry Brooks on it and doesn't have The Female Man, I can see why the compilers might not want to explain their criteria.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Xmen link
The mutations were based on their parents being exposed to radiation, having worked with radioactive materials, and then dying shortly after childbirth (or so I recall from the review) though this is the first I've ever heard of this book.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
There's a theory ...
... I scoffed at that theory and immediately went and got (one of) my dog eared copy/ies of Dhalgren and started reading ... I put it down at page 30 to go do something and never got back to reading it ... d'oh!
A bookselling friend saw me reading it in the first 30 pages (which is when he told me the above theory) and then went to check which printing I had ... and was startled to find that I had the first printing (something he'd never seen), but I think the scotch tape holding the front cover on probably reduced the value somewhat!
Re: There's a theory ...
Re: There's a theory ...
no subject