More anonymous concoms

[redbird]

minnehaha K posted last week [1], unhappy about the trend for con committees to sit behind email like chair@example.org and artshow@example.org with no name given.

A flyer for Lunacon turned up in the mail today. Two people working on the convention are identified: the Filk Mistress and the Regency Dance Master. Not, say, the chair, or the people running the dealers' room, art show, or registration.

The only reason I'm confident that there is a con chair is that she, he, it, or they takes credit for creating the convention flyer.

cattitude is poking around online as I write this, and reports that most of the articles on the website are credited to "chair" (still unnamed).

[1] Thanks for reminding me of who, fredcritter.

Comments

[catelynn.livejournal.com]

As someone who is running a different conference...this is an interesting point. We did use the anonymous email addys but it might be nice to have a name/face to the address.

I also got the lunacon flyer today and do not remember seeing anyones name on as any area leads.

[redbird]

As Fred noted, there are practical reasons to send email to "registration@example.org" or the like; that doesn't mean it can't say "Conference Chair: P. Q. Example, email to chair@example.org" instead of just "Conference Chair: chair@example.org".

This is particularly useful in a context where the competence or otherwise of the conrunners may be known, and a factor in whether I go to that con. (To say nothing of the off-chance that the chair will be someone I want not to be in the same county as, let alone the same con suite.)

[volund.livejournal.com]

... the chair will be someone I want not to be in the same county as, let alone the same con suite

For Lunarians/Lunacon, a distinct and very real possibility in some previous years.