Slightly irritated general request
Could people please include some useful description or labels when you post links. Not just "I agree with some but not all of his points" or "so-and-so makes sense". Take the extra moment to say "I agree with some but not all of his points about labeling and sexual orientation" or "so-and-so makes sense about $specified_topic_or_event".
At least, do that if you care whether I read the articles you're linking to.
At least, do that if you care whether I read the articles you're linking to.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
B
no subject
no subject
I went to see <cite><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0385004/" title="iMDB entry">House of Flying Daggers</a></cite> last night.
I went to see House of Flying Daggers (http://imdb.com/title/tt0385004/) last night.
I'm buying into the hype over <cite><a href="http://archive.salon.com/ent/indie/2004/10/07/daggers/" title="Salon Review, Subscription Required">House of Flying Daggers</a></cite>.
I'm buying into the hype over House of Flying Daggers (http://archive.salon.com/ent/indie/2004/10/07/daggers/).
The contents of the title attribute appear as a 'tool-tip' when you mouse over the link.
no subject
no subject
lame attempt at meta humor follows
Click Here (http://smokey.rhs.com/web/blog/rhs.nsf/stories/ClickHereConsideredHarmful).
no subject
no subject
Re: lame attempt at meta humor follows
I didn't know what to expect, but that was lame and kewl!
:-)
You swine!